「 ✦ Content ✦ 」

Facts of the Case:

Bobby, an anti-liquor activist in Kerala, was hacked to death by a group of 15 on December 26, 1999. It was a consequence of a quarrel that happened two days earlier, in which an associate of Bobby fought with an illicit liquor vendor. Joy Devaraj, the first accused, is alleged to have committed the act of stabbing Bobby with a sharp weapon, which ultimately caused the latter's death. The occurrence of the ill-fated incident was reportedly at about 7:40 PM, while the deceased was in talking terms with some of his friends near his house.

Legal Issue:

Whether Joy Devaraj's act constituted murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) or a lesser offense of culpable homicide not amounting to murder? 

Legal Provisions:

Section 299 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Culpable homicide.

Section 300 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Murder.

Section 300 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Punishment for murder.

Submissions by the Petitioner (Joy Devaraj):

The learned counsel for petitioner contented that the testimonies of witnesses, except that of the eyewitness, could not be considered due to patent material contradictions. In her dying declaration, the deceased had contradicted herself as to the weapon with which the crime was committed and the overt act performed by the appellant. One material witness had turned hostile. Even assuming that the incident had taken place; there is no intention of any particular person to commit the murder; hence the offence does not fall under Section 300 IPC.

Arguments advanced by Respondent (State of Kerala):

The State submitted before the Supreme Court that the findings arrived at by the Sessions Court and High Court were proved not to be perverse and the apex court should not interfere with the findings.

Court Analysis and Judgment:

The Supreme Court held that there were mere minor contradictions in the evidence of the witnesses which do not have the effect of shaking the basic core of their testimonies. The Court held that the prosecution has proved beyond doubt that Devaraj stabbed the deceased and as a result of that assault, the victim met with his death. The application of factors available in the case of Pulicherla Nagaraju, this Court holds that the act of the accused Devaraj satisfies all the ingredients of murder under Section 300 IPC. The Court observed that the attack was premeditated, with a deadly weapon used and upon a vital organ. All this would impress upon the assailant in an intention to cause death.

Conclusion:

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Joy Devaraj and confirmed his conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder. The Court highlighted that there were some minor discrepancies among the witnesses, but the same did not affect the overall credibility of the prosecution case. The above judgment reiterates the principle that in criminal cases it is the quality and not quantity of evidence which is essential; a single convenient and reliable witness can form the basis for the conviction. In what the Court delineated between murder and culpable homicide, states guidelines for like cases in future.

OLQ is a Pan-India basis law firm connecting legal expertise nationwide.

WRITTEN BY: MARIA THERESE SYRIAC

GUIDED BY: ADVOCATE ANIK